You and the right are basically poisoning the well by bringing this point up. That he was a kiddy fiddler is wholly irrelevant to the issue of Rittenhouse's guilt or justifications for shooting him.Sean Hayden wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 12:04 pm11 counts including anal rape. Though I tend to think of it as violence regardless.
Only in America
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 59295
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
Rittenhouse is guilty because he took the law into his own hands and people lost their lives.
--//--
Now, can we address the issue of how badly this situation has been framed or not?
I suspect not given that even the violent history of the victims is off limits.
--//--
Now, can we address the issue of how badly this situation has been framed or not?
I suspect not given that even the violent history of the victims is off limits.
- laklak
- Posts: 20981
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
11 counts? Look, I can see shooting the pervert if he'd had 12 previous counts, but only 11? Come on, give the guy a chance.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40340
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
That's riught, at 11 counts of sex related violent crime, you don't yet inject them, you just cut their things off without benefit of anesthetics, and if they do anything bad after that, you put them as the criminal in a film about China defpicting the death of 999 cuts, without benefit of any special effects or simulation.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 59295
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
We were discussing how it's been framed by you and the right.Sean Hayden wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 12:19 pmNow, can we address the issue of how badly this situation has been framed or not?
I suspect not given that even the violent history of the victims is off limits.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
If you don't see how the facts in the case contradict the popular framing of what happened then maybe you're not familiar with how it was framed. I will just point out that nearly everyone has changed their understanding as they become acquainted with the facts.
The right thinks he's innocent. I've never held that position.
What's with you types that need to dismiss everyone as right or left? What I've said stands on its own and can be accepted or not regardless of political leanings.
The right thinks he's innocent. I've never held that position.
What's with you types that need to dismiss everyone as right or left? What I've said stands on its own and can be accepted or not regardless of political leanings.
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73014
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
Sean, I don't think its a left vs right issue. You accept that he did the wrong thing, but seem to suggest that previous criminal behaviour of one of his victims somehow mitigates his crime. I can't see that being relevant to his actions at all...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
What?
The prior violent criminal behavior better explains what happened that night.
Here: BLM protest so bothered a young white supremacist that he crossed state lines looking to shoot people and unsurprisingly succeeded.
That has been the framing, and it's total horseshit.
A young man who saw the riots as destructive, took it upon himself to intervene in his own community --to act as the law-- and was attacked.
Why?
That's a more accurate portrayal. Understanding the violent past of the victims helps picture why they were involved and why things went down as they did.
--//--
There's more of course, but jesus, honestly man.
You know, I like to think of the poor BLM protesters having to put up with dumbass white wannabe revolutionaries --remember that, how they pleaded with those type of idiots to leave [?]-- that's who these victims were.
The prior violent criminal behavior better explains what happened that night.
Here: BLM protest so bothered a young white supremacist that he crossed state lines looking to shoot people and unsurprisingly succeeded.
That has been the framing, and it's total horseshit.
A young man who saw the riots as destructive, took it upon himself to intervene in his own community --to act as the law-- and was attacked.
Why?
That's a more accurate portrayal. Understanding the violent past of the victims helps picture why they were involved and why things went down as they did.
--//--
There's more of course, but jesus, honestly man.
You know, I like to think of the poor BLM protesters having to put up with dumbass white wannabe revolutionaries --remember that, how they pleaded with those type of idiots to leave [?]-- that's who these victims were.
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
I wonder if our disagreement stems from a need for things to be logically consistent, neat and tidy? But reality isn't.
Rittenhouse acted in self-defense and he's guilty.
That's reality, messy as hell.
I guess a smart enough lawyer could attempt to get around it as rEv did initially by assuming we just need another concept to cover this particular issue, a new law and presto, one is either guilty or innocent again and all is well...
Me, I wanna play devil --yeah, you acted in self-defense, and? --machismo--
Rittenhouse acted in self-defense and he's guilty.
That's reality, messy as hell.
I guess a smart enough lawyer could attempt to get around it as rEv did initially by assuming we just need another concept to cover this particular issue, a new law and presto, one is either guilty or innocent again and all is well...
Me, I wanna play devil --yeah, you acted in self-defense, and? --machismo--
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
You don't need another law. Just disqualify the "stand your ground" law from being applicable when being chased by someone with a plastic shopping bag or a skateboard.Sean Hayden wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:57 amI wonder if our disagreement stems from a need for things to be logically consistent, neat and tidy? But reality isn't.
Rittenhouse acted in self-defense and he's guilty.
That's reality, messy as hell.
I guess a smart enough lawyer could attempt to get around it as rEv did initially by assuming we just need another concept to cover this particular issue, a new law and presto, one is either guilty or innocent again and all is well...
Me, I wanna play devil --yeah, you acted in self-defense, and? --machismo--
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
No one was shot while chasing Rittenhouse with a bag or skateboard.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
Sean Hayden wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:38 amNo one was shot while chasing Rittenhouse with a bag or skateboard.
LinkVideo footage showed Rittenhouse being pursued across a parking lot by a group of people. Rosenbaum threw a plastic bag containing socks, underwear, and deodorant at Rittenhouse. A bystander named Joshua Ziminski fired a shot into the air, and then Rittenhouse stopped running and turned towards the sound of the shot. Rittenhouse testified at trial that prior to being chased by Rosenbaum, he heard another man tell Rosenbaum to "get him and kill him," but also knew that Rosenbaum was unarmed. Rittenhouse testified that he aimed his gun at Rosenbaum to deter him from pursuing him further.
Witnesses for the prosecution testified at trial that Rosenbaum engaged Rittenhouse and tried to take his rifle from him. At 11:48 pm, Rittenhouse then fired four rounds at Rosenbaum, hitting his groin, back and left hand. The bullets perforated Rosenbaum's heart, aorta, pulmonary artery and right lung, fractured his pelvis, and caused minor wounds to his left thigh and forehead.
[...]
Anthony Huber, made contact with Rittenhouse's left shoulder with a skateboard as the pair struggled for control of the gun. As Huber was pulling on the rifle, Rittenhouse fired once, hitting Huber in the chest, perforating his heart and right lung, causing his rapid death.
So, three weapons were involved:
a) A plastic bag containing socks, underwear, and deodorant
b) A skateboard
c) A Smith & Wesson AR-15 style .223 rifle with a magazine holding 30 rounds
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
So no one was shot while chasing Rittenhouse with a bag or skateboard. What actually happened was that the first victim chased Rittenhouse and was only shot after he attempted to take his gun. The second victim also went for the gun after swinging his skateboard at Rittenhouse while Rittenhouse laid on the ground.
Both victims attempted to take the gun.
Both victims attempted to take the gun.
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73014
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
Attempting to take the gun could well be viewed as a heroic act by someone trying to disarm a dangerous armed lunatic...Sean Hayden wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 3:20 amSo no one was shot while chasing Rittenhouse with a bag or skateboard. What actually happened was that the first victim chased Rittenhouse and was only shot after he attempted to take his gun. The second victim also went for the gun after swinging his skateboard at Rittenhouse while Rittenhouse laid on the ground.
Both victims attempted to take the gun.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17879
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Only in America
This is why it's important to understand the actors involved and what they were doing so you can avoid such grotesque misrepresentations.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests