Due to the earth's massive overpopulation problem, I am perfectly happy with those numbers and have no desire to impose more laws which restrict my freedom. The faster the population grows, the sooner the demise of the human race.Hermit wrote:1. I challenge you to find a single utterance by me in support of prohibiting the ownership of guns.Collector1337 wrote:Why is it that anti-gun nuts only complain and see the problem as "gun violence" and not just all violence in general?Hermit wrote:Problem: Gun violence.
Solution: More guns.
Ayup, that must be it.
It's like as long as there is no "gun violence" they're perfectly happy, and don't give a shit when then all other violence goes up.
I'd much rather have more "gun violence" but less overall crime, then have less "gun violence" but more overall crime.
2. I have consistently pointed out that - in Australia at least - trends in violent crimes (as well as nonviolent ones, come to think of it) are not in lockstep with the rate of ownership of guns. If you care to think of it, that fact gives comfort to neither the pro-gun lobby, nor the anti-gun lobby.
One thing that is worth noting in regard to the availability of firearms relates to handgun homicides: Between 2007 and 2011 there were between 6115 and 7398 of them in the USA each year and between 3 and 9 in Australia, which works out to a range of 1.98 - 2.46 and 0.01 - 0.03 respectively per 100,000 people.
Also, all crime in general has been dropping off, declining every decade for a while now.
I see no cause for concern when taking into account these factors.