Făkünamę wrote:The reason for criminal on criminal violence is pretty simple: they cannot go to the civil authorities to settle their disputes.
Given that simple truism, it's to be expected that violence amongst criminal elements of society will always be higher than violence amongst the law-abiding citizens of any country.
Yup. And it pisses me off when Netwits use criminal-on-criminal gun violence, which comprises the vast majority of shootings, particularly of black inner city young adults that gun-banners like to categorize as "children" to bolster their fake numbers, as an argument for disarming law abiding citizens.
I'm perfectly happy for criminals to shoot each other. Unfortunately, they too often shoot innocent people in the process, so we really need to dispose of them quickly, which means arming the citizenry and declaring outlawry on known criminals wherein they can be shot on sight by any citizen...for a reward.
I also think when we arrest them and convict them, we should set them to a gladiatorial contest against each other. We can televise them. Trial by combat, so to speak, with the winner getting a lavish cell with lots of food and women (or men) to screw while serving their sentence.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.