The case against guns

Guns don't kill threads; Ratz kill threads!
Locked
User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Blind groper » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:23 am

I am not an expert on bears, but it is really easy to check web sites, which I did. The Forest Service recommends that guns not be used against bears, and that bear spray works better, in that it increases your chances of surviving a bear encounter.

I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!

If gun nutters insist on carrying guns in bear country, the question is whether the USA will run out of bears or gun nutters first?

User avatar
orpheus
Posts: 1522
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by orpheus » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:28 am

Blind groper wrote:I am not an expert on bears, but it is really easy to check web sites, which I did. The Forest Service recommends that guns not be used against bears, and that bear spray works better, in that it increases your chances of surviving a bear encounter.

I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!

If gun nutters insist on carrying guns in bear country, the question is whether the USA will run out of bears or gun nutters first?
That might considerably change the picture...
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.

—Richard Serra

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Seth » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:11 am

Făkünamę wrote:I believe Seth has stated (in fact I know he has) that he carries both - bearspray and a firearm. Why would he do that if his first resort was his firearm?

Can we get some people with a memory spanning more than the last sentence they typed in here?
I do carry bear spray in grizzly country. Not routinely in black bear country though, they aren't normally as aggressive. Which I resort to first depends on the conditions and situation. Bear spray doesn't work for shit if the wind is blowing in your face...it just seasons you a bit, adding a nice piquancy to your otherwise rather bland taste.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Seth » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:15 am

Blind groper wrote:I am not an expert on bears, but it is really easy to check web sites, which I did. The Forest Service recommends that guns not be used against bears, and that bear spray works better, in that it increases your chances of surviving a bear encounter.

I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!

If gun nutters insist on carrying guns in bear country, the question is whether the USA will run out of bears or gun nutters first?
You do have to carry the RIGHT gun. My .50 AE Desert Eagle handgun is up to the job, as is a .44 Magnum or a .454 Casull.

And then there's rifles and shotguns.

Carrying multiple tools of defense is always a good idea, which is why I carry both a concealed handgun and a pepper spray container in public. Which one gets used depends on the situation.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Jason » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:25 am

.44 mag is a bit light if you ask me. 12 gauge slugs of any kind do the job well enough. .308 is a bit light, but heavier loads work. .30-06 with 200gr bullets are about optimal unless you just want it dead.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Seth » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:30 am

Făkünamę wrote:.44 mag is a bit light if you ask me. 12 gauge slugs of any kind do the job well enough. .308 is a bit light, but heavier loads work. .30-06 with 200gr bullets are about optimal unless you just want it dead.
.308 in a LaRue OBR semi-automatic rifle allows you to put multiple rounds on target till it stops moving...even better.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Jason » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:33 am

I generally don't spray and pray.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Seth » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:38 am

Făkünamę wrote:I generally don't spray and pray.
I don't either. I aim carefully and send rounds to vital areas in sufficient quantity to kill the subject. One or ten doesn't matter, it ain't hunting, it's self-defense.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Collector1337
Posts: 1259
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
Location: US Mother Fucking A
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Collector1337 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:43 am

orpheus wrote:
Collector1337 wrote:
orpheus wrote:
Collector1337 wrote:
I doubt bear spray has the range of a .44 magnum. I'll stick with the .44 mag.
You don't believe the US Forest Svc's data? Or you just like to play fast and loose with your own safety?
Rangers have guns...
And you know for a fact that they don't have bear spray too?
They might have it in a vehicle, but they definitely don't walk around with it. They walk around with guns though.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

User avatar
Collector1337
Posts: 1259
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
Location: US Mother Fucking A
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Collector1337 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:46 am

Blind groper wrote:
I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!
Thinks bullets only "enrage" bears. LOL!

No, bullets tend to kill bears just like anything else.

Your ignorance is hilarious.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Blind groper » Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:07 am

Collector

Re bullets killing bears. Yes, if the bullet is well aimed. However, the Forest Service does not warn against using hand guns, and relying on bear spray instead for no good reason.

Seth's recent posts conjured up this image of the guy falling into water and sinking like a stone with weight of all his armaments. There is such a thing as being over equipped.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51239
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Tero » Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:08 am

He stood his ground
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/2 ... t-to-Court#

but was black. Tough luck.

User avatar
orpheus
Posts: 1522
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by orpheus » Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:18 pm

Collector1337 wrote:
orpheus wrote:
Collector1337 wrote:
orpheus wrote:
Collector1337 wrote:
I doubt bear spray has the range of a .44 magnum. I'll stick with the .44 mag.
You don't believe the US Forest Svc's data? Or you just like to play fast and loose with your own safety?
Rangers have guns...
And you know for a fact that they don't have bear spray too?
They might have it in a vehicle, but they definitely don't walk around with it. They walk around with guns though.
You know this how?
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.

—Richard Serra

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51239
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Tero » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:05 pm

I was thinking more about bear logic. At close range he is faster at killing you. Why shouldn't he? If he runs he could get pellets in his leg again.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The case against guns

Post by Seth » Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:00 pm

Collector1337 wrote:
orpheus wrote:
Collector1337 wrote:
orpheus wrote:
Collector1337 wrote:
I doubt bear spray has the range of a .44 magnum. I'll stick with the .44 mag.
You don't believe the US Forest Svc's data? Or you just like to play fast and loose with your own safety?
Rangers have guns...
And you know for a fact that they don't have bear spray too?
They might have it in a vehicle, but they definitely don't walk around with it. They walk around with guns though.
They walk around with both, or one or the other. If they are law enforcement rangers, who are a select and specially trained subset of Rangers, they carry sidearms, have shotguns and AR-15s in their vehicles, and in places like Glacier NP they DO carry bear spray also.

Non-LE Rangers don't carry firearms but DO carry bear spray when in the wilderness in bear country.

It depends on where they work. The Rangers at Gettysburg and other non-wilderness parks generally don't carry either unless they are specifically LE Rangers.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests