The case against guns
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
I am not an expert on bears, but it is really easy to check web sites, which I did. The Forest Service recommends that guns not be used against bears, and that bear spray works better, in that it increases your chances of surviving a bear encounter.
I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!
If gun nutters insist on carrying guns in bear country, the question is whether the USA will run out of bears or gun nutters first?
I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!
If gun nutters insist on carrying guns in bear country, the question is whether the USA will run out of bears or gun nutters first?
- orpheus
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
- About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
That might considerably change the picture...Blind groper wrote:I am not an expert on bears, but it is really easy to check web sites, which I did. The Forest Service recommends that guns not be used against bears, and that bear spray works better, in that it increases your chances of surviving a bear encounter.
I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!
If gun nutters insist on carrying guns in bear country, the question is whether the USA will run out of bears or gun nutters first?
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.
—Richard Serra
—Richard Serra
Re: The case against guns
I do carry bear spray in grizzly country. Not routinely in black bear country though, they aren't normally as aggressive. Which I resort to first depends on the conditions and situation. Bear spray doesn't work for shit if the wind is blowing in your face...it just seasons you a bit, adding a nice piquancy to your otherwise rather bland taste.Făkünamę wrote:I believe Seth has stated (in fact I know he has) that he carries both - bearspray and a firearm. Why would he do that if his first resort was his firearm?
Can we get some people with a memory spanning more than the last sentence they typed in here?
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Re: The case against guns
You do have to carry the RIGHT gun. My .50 AE Desert Eagle handgun is up to the job, as is a .44 Magnum or a .454 Casull.Blind groper wrote:I am not an expert on bears, but it is really easy to check web sites, which I did. The Forest Service recommends that guns not be used against bears, and that bear spray works better, in that it increases your chances of surviving a bear encounter.
I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!
If gun nutters insist on carrying guns in bear country, the question is whether the USA will run out of bears or gun nutters first?
And then there's rifles and shotguns.
Carrying multiple tools of defense is always a good idea, which is why I carry both a concealed handgun and a pepper spray container in public. Which one gets used depends on the situation.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Re: The case against guns
.44 mag is a bit light if you ask me. 12 gauge slugs of any kind do the job well enough. .308 is a bit light, but heavier loads work. .30-06 with 200gr bullets are about optimal unless you just want it dead.
Re: The case against guns
.308 in a LaRue OBR semi-automatic rifle allows you to put multiple rounds on target till it stops moving...even better.Făkünamę wrote:.44 mag is a bit light if you ask me. 12 gauge slugs of any kind do the job well enough. .308 is a bit light, but heavier loads work. .30-06 with 200gr bullets are about optimal unless you just want it dead.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Re: The case against guns
I generally don't spray and pray.
Re: The case against guns
I don't either. I aim carefully and send rounds to vital areas in sufficient quantity to kill the subject. One or ten doesn't matter, it ain't hunting, it's self-defense.Făkünamę wrote:I generally don't spray and pray.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- Collector1337
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
- About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
- Location: US Mother Fucking A
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
They might have it in a vehicle, but they definitely don't walk around with it. They walk around with guns though.orpheus wrote:And you know for a fact that they don't have bear spray too?Collector1337 wrote:Rangers have guns...orpheus wrote:You don't believe the US Forest Svc's data? Or you just like to play fast and loose with your own safety?Collector1337 wrote:
I doubt bear spray has the range of a .44 magnum. I'll stick with the .44 mag.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
- Collector1337
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
- About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
- Location: US Mother Fucking A
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
Thinks bullets only "enrage" bears. LOL!Blind groper wrote:
I suspect (though the web page did not say this) that bears are pretty tough beasties, and guns sometimes just enrage them. An enraged bear is not a comfortable companion!
No, bullets tend to kill bears just like anything else.
Your ignorance is hilarious.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
Collector
Re bullets killing bears. Yes, if the bullet is well aimed. However, the Forest Service does not warn against using hand guns, and relying on bear spray instead for no good reason.
Seth's recent posts conjured up this image of the guy falling into water and sinking like a stone with weight of all his armaments. There is such a thing as being over equipped.
Re bullets killing bears. Yes, if the bullet is well aimed. However, the Forest Service does not warn against using hand guns, and relying on bear spray instead for no good reason.
Seth's recent posts conjured up this image of the guy falling into water and sinking like a stone with weight of all his armaments. There is such a thing as being over equipped.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51239
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
He stood his ground
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/2 ... t-to-Court#
but was black. Tough luck.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/2 ... t-to-Court#
but was black. Tough luck.
- orpheus
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
- About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
You know this how?Collector1337 wrote:They might have it in a vehicle, but they definitely don't walk around with it. They walk around with guns though.orpheus wrote:And you know for a fact that they don't have bear spray too?Collector1337 wrote:Rangers have guns...orpheus wrote:You don't believe the US Forest Svc's data? Or you just like to play fast and loose with your own safety?Collector1337 wrote:
I doubt bear spray has the range of a .44 magnum. I'll stick with the .44 mag.
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.
—Richard Serra
—Richard Serra
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51239
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The case against guns
I was thinking more about bear logic. At close range he is faster at killing you. Why shouldn't he? If he runs he could get pellets in his leg again.
Re: The case against guns
They walk around with both, or one or the other. If they are law enforcement rangers, who are a select and specially trained subset of Rangers, they carry sidearms, have shotguns and AR-15s in their vehicles, and in places like Glacier NP they DO carry bear spray also.Collector1337 wrote:They might have it in a vehicle, but they definitely don't walk around with it. They walk around with guns though.orpheus wrote:And you know for a fact that they don't have bear spray too?Collector1337 wrote:Rangers have guns...orpheus wrote:You don't believe the US Forest Svc's data? Or you just like to play fast and loose with your own safety?Collector1337 wrote:
I doubt bear spray has the range of a .44 magnum. I'll stick with the .44 mag.
Non-LE Rangers don't carry firearms but DO carry bear spray when in the wilderness in bear country.
It depends on where they work. The Rangers at Gettysburg and other non-wilderness parks generally don't carry either unless they are specifically LE Rangers.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests