And the police were where, exactly, while this poor guy was getting beaten nearly to death?piscator wrote:
Rhetorical question.
Answer: Not there.
Coupla rounds into the instigators might have sent the rest running. Usually does.
And the police were where, exactly, while this poor guy was getting beaten nearly to death?piscator wrote:
Seth wrote:And the police were where, exactly, while this poor guy was getting beaten nearly to death?piscator wrote:
Rhetorical question.
Answer: Not there.
Coupla rounds into the instigators might have sent the rest running. Usually does.
Er, the point is that any one of them COULD have shot the guy...with their illegally-possessed gun that they didn't register and didn't have a background check to acquire...and some folks here would strip the victim of the right to be LEGALLY armed for self defense.piscator wrote:Seth wrote:And the police were where, exactly, while this poor guy was getting beaten nearly to death?piscator wrote:
Rhetorical question.
Answer: Not there.
Coupla rounds into the instigators might have sent the rest running. Usually does.
All I can say is it's a gosh darn good thing none of those vigilantes 'instigators' used firearms, as carried away as they got.
Complaint against Kaarma (pdf)A western Montana man has been charged in the shooting death of a 17-year-old boy after prosecutors said he set a trap in his garage to catch any would-be burglars because he was frustrated over recent thefts.
Yabbut wasn't he just standing his ground?Gallstones wrote:This is tragic and heartbreaking.
I hope Kaarma and his GF are convicted and go to prison.
Every law abiding gun owner, firearms enthusiast and Second Amendment supporter should speak against MK and shun him with prejudice.
Missoula man shoots and kills 17 yo German exchange studentComplaint against Kaarma (pdf)A western Montana man has been charged in the shooting death of a 17-year-old boy after prosecutors said he set a trap in his garage to catch any would-be burglars because he was frustrated over recent thefts.
It's interesting to see the ethical lines drawn by the gun lobby...Hermit wrote:Yabbut wasn't he just standing his ground?Gallstones wrote:This is tragic and heartbreaking.
I hope Kaarma and his GF are convicted and go to prison.
Every law abiding gun owner, firearms enthusiast and Second Amendment supporter should speak against MK and shun him with prejudice.
Missoula man shoots and kills 17 yo German exchange studentComplaint against Kaarma (pdf)A western Montana man has been charged in the shooting death of a 17-year-old boy after prosecutors said he set a trap in his garage to catch any would-be burglars because he was frustrated over recent thefts.
That's exactly what I'm getting at. I recall the occasion where a man felt threatened by a bunch of teenagers who drove past his home in a car and shot at them. He missed, killing someone else who happened to be driving past in another car instead. He was not charged with anything at all because he was exercising his right of standing his ground. Bad luck for the innocent passer-by, I suppose, but a similar case can be made for the murder Gallstone linked to.JimC wrote:It's interesting to see the ethical lines drawn by the gun lobby...Hermit wrote:Yabbut wasn't he just standing his ground?Gallstones wrote:This is tragic and heartbreaking.
I hope Kaarma and his GF are convicted and go to prison.
Every law abiding gun owner, firearms enthusiast and Second Amendment supporter should speak against MK and shun him with prejudice.
Missoula man shoots and kills 17 yo German exchange studentComplaint against Kaarma (pdf)A western Montana man has been charged in the shooting death of a 17-year-old boy after prosecutors said he set a trap in his garage to catch any would-be burglars because he was frustrated over recent thefts.
I mean, I agree with Gallstones that this was an appalling act, but it is simply a logical extension of the apparent right to shoot any intruder if you have the slightest fear for your safety...
This isnt' about shooting at passing cars, this is about shooting at two intruders inside the man's home.Hermit wrote:That's exactly what I'm getting at. I recall the occasion where a man felt threatened by a bunch of teenagers who drove past his home in a car and shot at them. He missed, killing someone else who happened to be driving past in another car instead. He was not charged with anything at all because he was exercising his right of standing his ground. Bad luck for the innocent passer-by, I suppose, but a similar case can be made for the murder Gallstone linked to.JimC wrote:It's interesting to see the ethical lines drawn by the gun lobby...Hermit wrote:Yabbut wasn't he just standing his ground?Gallstones wrote:This is tragic and heartbreaking.
I hope Kaarma and his GF are convicted and go to prison.
Every law abiding gun owner, firearms enthusiast and Second Amendment supporter should speak against MK and shun him with prejudice.
Missoula man shoots and kills 17 yo German exchange studentComplaint against Kaarma (pdf)A western Montana man has been charged in the shooting death of a 17-year-old boy after prosecutors said he set a trap in his garage to catch any would-be burglars because he was frustrated over recent thefts.
I mean, I agree with Gallstones that this was an appalling act, but it is simply a logical extension of the apparent right to shoot any intruder if you have the slightest fear for your safety...
The question for the court will be whether or not he reasonably believed that the intruders were committing a forcible felony. Sub (a) is problematic because technically both persons who were "occupying" the structure were outside of the garage and arguably were not "then in the occupied structure." This might or might not mas sub (a) inapplicable, it's an interesting legal quirk.45-3-103. Use of force in defense of occupied structure. (1) A person is justified in the use of force or threat to use force against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that the use of force is necessary to prevent or terminate the other person's unlawful entry into or attack upon an occupied structure.
(2) A person justified in the use of force pursuant to subsection (1) is justified in the use of force likely to cause death or serious bodily harm only if:
(a) the entry is made or attempted and the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent an assault upon the person or another then in the occupied structure; or
(b) the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony in the occupied structure.
I'm happy too, we don't need your kind in the US! Can we please send all the liberals, progressives and socialists down under...one way or another?Hermit wrote:In order to get away from the possible focus of a nuclear conflagration during the cold war, my parents decided to emigrate. The original plan was to move to the US. I cannot begin to describe how happy I am that they changed their mind and we settled in Australia instead.
Hermit wrote:That's exactly what I'm getting at. I recall the occasion where a man felt threatened by a bunch of teenagers who drove past his home in a car and shot at them. He missed, killing someone else who happened to be driving past in another car instead. He was not charged with anything at all because he was exercising his right of standing his ground. Bad luck for the innocent passer-by, I suppose, but a similar case can be made for the murder Gallstone linked to.JimC wrote:It's interesting to see the ethical lines drawn by the gun lobby...Hermit wrote:Yabbut wasn't he just standing his ground?Gallstones wrote:This is tragic and heartbreaking.
I hope Kaarma and his GF are convicted and go to prison.
Every law abiding gun owner, firearms enthusiast and Second Amendment supporter should speak against MK and shun him with prejudice.
Missoula man shoots and kills 17 yo German exchange studentComplaint against Kaarma (pdf)A western Montana man has been charged in the shooting death of a 17-year-old boy after prosecutors said he set a trap in his garage to catch any would-be burglars because he was frustrated over recent thefts.
I mean, I agree with Gallstones that this was an appalling act, but it is simply a logical extension of the apparent right to shoot any intruder if you have the slightest fear for your safety...
Er, I said that, explicitly, you dunce. As usual you went into apoplexy when you saw the words "set-gun" and didn't bother to read the rest.piscator wrote:I see the usual shithawk has swooped in to assume another set of ex recto legal assertions and asseverations concerning the subject of premeditation.
Set guns have been textbook examples of premeditation and aggravating factors in US criminal law for at least a century. It's against the law to murder a squirrel with a set gun in all 50 States, much less a human being. :puke:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests