Guns don't kill threads; Ratz kill threads!
-
Collector1337
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 10:24 am
- About me: I am a satire of your stereotype about me.
- Location: US Mother Fucking A
-
Contact:
Post
by Collector1337 » Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:51 pm
I'm sure this will get moved, but whatever.
CDC Study: Use of Firearms For Self-Defense is ‘Important Crime Deterrent’
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/cdc-stu ... -deterrent
"The $10 million study was commissioned by President Barack Obama as part of 23 executive orders he signed in January."
“Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was ‘used’ by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies,” the CDC study, entitled “Priorities For Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence,” states.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-
Cormac
- Posts: 6415
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Cormac » Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:56 pm
Collector1337 wrote:I'm sure this will get moved, but whatever.
CDC Study: Use of Firearms For Self-Defense is ‘Important Crime Deterrent’
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/cdc-stu ... -deterrent
"The $10 million study was commissioned by President Barack Obama as part of 23 executive orders he signed in January."
“Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was ‘used’ by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies,” the CDC study, entitled “Priorities For Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence,” states.
No surprise to me. I support a citizen's right to bear arms. Sincerely.
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!
Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
-
Contact:
Post
by Robert_S » Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:58 pm
Yep, as long as the gun owner can remain sane.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
macdoc
- Twitcher
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
- Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
-
Contact:
Post
by macdoc » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:06 pm
Love the spin....
found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies,
and the injury rates for those not emplying self protective strategy?? of course it's missing..
consider the source of the article
-
Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
- Location: Scotlifornia
-
Contact:
Post
by Bella Fortuna » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:20 pm
Does this belong in the gun forum?
-
Ian
- Mr Incredible
- Posts: 16975
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
- Location: Washington DC
Post
by Ian » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:21 pm
Biased source = unreliable. And if you don't care how reliable your information is, your opinion is no better than a person who turns to the bible for answers about understanding the universe. You care not about learning. Rather, you've replaced objective fact for cherry-picking bits and pieces to suit the preferences you had beforehand.
-
Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
-
Contact:
Post
by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:26 pm
Bella Fortuna wrote:Does this belong in the gun forum?
Out, damned spot!
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”
-
Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer
- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
- Location: Nottingham UK
-
Contact:
Post
by Xamonas Chegwé » Wed Jul 24, 2013 12:07 am
Bella Fortuna wrote:Does this belong in the gun forum?
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing 
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
