Insurrection!

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Robert_S » Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:54 am

I have heard that those many of those Iranians who helped overthrow the Shaw were unpleasantly surprised with the theocracy they ended up with.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by JimC » Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:37 am

Clinton Huxley wrote:At what point does it become the duty of a free-born citizenry to rise up against a "democratically" elected government turned tyrannical enemy of the people?

Just askin'......
I will treat this very seriously indeed...

It would need to be truly extreme. Some points:

* You have put democratically in inverted commas. Is this mere hyperbole, or are you implying a situation of a corruptly rigged election? If so, has the government put in place measures which prevent exposing and dealing with this, such as nobbling an independent judiciary or a free press?

* Are there tanks in the street? Have opposition leaders been imprisoned? Have the tyrannical new government overturned the normal checks and balances, and made it clear that elections will be indefinitely postponed?

* When you speak of people rising up, do you mean it is the desire of a clear majority of the people, or a minority of egotistical fanatics, determined to be a "vanguard of the people", whether they want it or not...

If you are referring to the current situation in the UK, then protest, lobby, agitate, even foment civil disobedience if the issue seems to demand it, but let's not get caught up in the romantic rhetoric of the left, and turn down the path which inexorably leads to either extreme polarisation and a military crack-down, or a sucessful revolution, and the inevitable show trials and executions of "enemies of the people"...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
stripes4
Mrs Pawiz esq.
Posts: 8013
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:22 pm
About me: lucky
happy
bossy
lumpy
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by stripes4 » Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:57 pm

JimC wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:At what point does it become the duty of a free-born citizenry to rise up against a "democratically" elected government turned tyrannical enemy of the people?

Just askin'......
I will treat this very seriously indeed...

It would need to be truly extreme. Some points:

* You have put democratically in inverted commas. Is this mere hyperbole, or are you implying a situation of a corruptly rigged election? If so, has the government put in place measures which prevent exposing and dealing with this, such as nobbling an independent judiciary or a free press?

* Are there tanks in the street? Have opposition leaders been imprisoned? Have the tyrannical new government overturned the normal checks and balances, and made it clear that elections will be indefinitely postponed?

* When you speak of people rising up, do you mean it is the desire of a clear majority of the people, or a minority of egotistical fanatics, determined to be a "vanguard of the people", whether they want it or not...

If you are referring to the current situation in the UK, then protest, lobby, agitate, even foment civil disobedience if the issue seems to demand it, but let's not get caught up in the romantic rhetoric of the left, and turn down the path which inexorably leads to either extreme polarisation and a military crack-down, or a sucessful revolution, and the inevitable show trials and executions of "enemies of the people"...
:dance: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Generally opening mouth simply to change the foot that I'll be putting in there

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:05 pm

I was thinking more on the lines of civil disobedience than civil war. For example, when New Tory were thinking of implementing ID cards, it occurred to me that if 10 or 100 or 10,000 refused to have one, the policy would still go ahead. If a million said "no" the policy would be dead. So it's more civil non-cooperation than, say, stringing the lib dems up from lamp posts.

User avatar
stripes4
Mrs Pawiz esq.
Posts: 8013
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:22 pm
About me: lucky
happy
bossy
lumpy
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by stripes4 » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:07 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:I was thinking more on the lines of civil disobedience than civil war. For example, when New Tory were thinking of implementing ID cards, it occurred to me that if 10 or 100 or 10,000 refused to have one, the policy would still go ahead. If a million said "no" the policy would be dead. So it's more civil non-cooperation than, say, stringing the lib dems up from lamp posts.
Oh don't spoil the argument by being all bloody reasonable. :roll:
Generally opening mouth simply to change the foot that I'll be putting in there

User avatar
electricwhiteboy
Ipsissimus
Posts: 392
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by electricwhiteboy » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:12 pm

Well you can call it an act of mutiny, or cowardice, or anarchy, but I finally realised my enemy are the bastards in authority. I got more in common with the bugger on my bayonet than the toff who's telling me to stick it in his guts.
Last edited by electricwhiteboy on Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:13 pm

I reserve the right to foment bloody revolution, though. When a political elite considers itself above the law, enacts policies that destroy the poor, indeed treats them like criminals and generally ravages the nation in it's own self interest, all within a system of phoney democracy, then something has to give

User avatar
stripes4
Mrs Pawiz esq.
Posts: 8013
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:22 pm
About me: lucky
happy
bossy
lumpy
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by stripes4 » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:14 pm

grumpy. Have you got an ickle hangover? :cry:
Generally opening mouth simply to change the foot that I'll be putting in there

User avatar
GrahamH
Posts: 921
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:29 pm
Location: South coast, UK
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by GrahamH » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:16 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:I reserve the right to foment bloody revolution, though. When a political elite considers itself above the law, enacts policies that destroy the poor, indeed treats them like criminals and generally ravages the nation in it's own self interest, all within a system of phoney democracy, then something has to give
It won't be this government that gives. :hehe: ;ob;

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:19 pm

The as good as dead hand of Thatcher spreads across the land...

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Robert_S » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:30 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:I was thinking more on the lines of civil disobedience than civil war. For example, when New Tory were thinking of implementing ID cards, it occurred to me that if 10 or 100 or 10,000 refused to have one, the policy would still go ahead. If a million said "no" the policy would be dead. So it's more civil non-cooperation than, say, stringing the lib dems up from lamp posts.
Right, string the lib-dems up afterwards? :begging: Just a little?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:31 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:I was thinking more on the lines of civil disobedience than civil war. For example, when New Tory were thinking of implementing ID cards, it occurred to me that if 10 or 100 or 10,000 refused to have one, the policy would still go ahead. If a million said "no" the policy would be dead. So it's more civil non-cooperation than, say, stringing the lib dems up from lamp posts.
Right, string the lib-dems up afterwards? :begging: Just a little?
Well, let's not rule it out just yet

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:05 pm

And now, apparently, defence manufacturers are liaising with police forces to provide new armoured vehicles and unmanned drones. Welcome to police state Britain..

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Feck » Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:13 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:I was thinking more on the lines of civil disobedience than civil war. For example, when New Tory were thinking of implementing ID cards, it occurred to me that if 10 or 100 or 10,000 refused to have one, the policy would still go ahead. If a million said "no" the policy would be dead. So it's more civil non-cooperation than, say, stringing the lib dems up from lamp posts.
They were planning to use your left pinkie finger print on the Id cards ......Good luck with that yah bastards :hehe:
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Insurrection!

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:15 pm

That right, Feck? Why should the Yakuza get off?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests