rationalia.com

I don't know what on earth that was about, but I'll post what I was planning to. The way people are claiming certain kinds of "censorship" are "wrong" in this thread strikes me as bizarre. If many of you are subjectivists or relativists, as you claim to be, you're not saying anything more significa...

I exhausted my english when I said "I don't know".

I don't know what on earth that was about, but I'll post what I was planning to. The way people are claiming certain kinds of "censorship" are "wrong" in this thread strikes me as bizarre. If many of you are subjectivists or relativists, as you claim to be, you're not saying anything more significan...

I've read through the 34 pages of this thread and remain baffled as to what the issue is.

What seems to be the officer, problem?

Interesting thread.

Having read the transcript (thanks for providing that Seraph :td: ) I wonder if Harris understands what a descriptive account of ethics is meant to do for an objectivist. He doesn't use it to his advantage. I don't know where he gets this thing about the popularity of normative relativism, because i...

Here I am. Praise me!

(Also, I'm in.)

As I said. If I die, the whole of history shall die with me.

Woo! I got one and it only took me three innocents to do it.

I vote for Blipandi.

Okay, I vote for Witticism... just because I want him dead.

Damn, I'm bad at this.

I vote for that suspicious looking Skinny Puppy.

:twisted:

I vote for THWOTH!

I vote for Irreligionist!

irreligionist wrote:

Spinozasgalt wrote:

irreligionist wrote:I'd love to know who was who.

I'm going to kill you. You are sooooo dead.

So you were a fellow innocent, huh?

Pure as baby Jesu... his mother Mar... snow.

Thanks to everyone for such a lovely welcome.