The absolute epitome of the notion of supremacy, not only subjugating, but working to control the tone of the discussion concerning subjugation.
Doesn't get any more racist than that.
Search found 826 matches
- Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:51 pm
- Forum: News, Current Events & Politics
- Topic: Critical Race Theory
- Replies: 242
- Views: 30002
- Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:26 pm
- Forum: Science, Technology & Environment
- Topic: Gain of Function Research
- Replies: 38
- Views: 6566
Re: Gain of Function Research
Well, this is an oddity, and no mistake. A thread in which I'm more closely aligned with Rainbow than with Lak.
- Thu Jan 20, 2022 6:52 pm
- Forum: News, Current Events & Politics
- Topic: Critical Race Theory
- Replies: 242
- Views: 30002
Re: Critical Race Theory
Pah. It was an easy read because you write so well. Thank you. I was rather taken with your analogy of blacknuss as akin to a disability, which strikes me as quite a powerful one because of its obviousness and simplicity. You cannot get the go-ahead for a building these days without considering acc...
- Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:27 pm
- Forum: News, Current Events & Politics
- Topic: Critical Race Theory
- Replies: 242
- Views: 30002
Re: Critical Race Theory
I'm grateful and impressed in equal measure that you made it all the way through. Thank you.
- Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:36 pm
- Forum: News, Current Events & Politics
- Topic: Critical Race Theory
- Replies: 242
- Views: 30002
Re: Critical Race Theory
I wrote a little thought experiment on CRT a while back. The Supremacy of History Note that this isn't a description of CRT itself, it's a look at the implications for the way we view history, which is one of the major ways that inequality manifests. Properly, CRT is an advanced field of study in hu...
- Sat Apr 11, 2015 3:44 am
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
Yes, you did. All of that was complete cock, and there's simply no reasoning with you, which is why all I have for you is the usual, and I can't even be bothered with that at the moment. Maybe I'll call you a cunt some more in a few months, as it's all you're really worthy of.Seth wrote:Fail.
- Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:27 pm
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
I'm keeping out of it for a bit now. I like kicking him, but the novelty's wearing off now. I simply don't like bullies, so I fuck with them where I can. All the chew's gone out of Seth now, though, and I can't be bothered. Plus, there's hardly anybody left here for him to bully.
- Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:11 pm
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
I note that Seth is using the proper noun formulation. He's correct that I certainly have an opinion on the existence of that preposterous entity, though I wouldn't call it a belief, largely because I have no use for the term 'belief', it being almost as nebulous as 'god'. I'd call it a fact that th...
- Thu Apr 09, 2015 1:32 am
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
Not much for deep humor, are you? Think "compost." There's nothing so humorous as you thinking you have any depth, moron. Still here, are you? I have this hypothesis that I wish to test, namely that all the nice, intelligent people will come back when you fuck off and take your toxic stupidity with...
- Wed Apr 08, 2015 5:46 pm
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
- Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:09 am
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
I disagree. Stop press: moron has a different opinion. If everything is interdependent and interacting it creates a much more complex system than if each thing is independent and not interacting. An awful lot of extraneous verbiage in there, since complexity is simply behaviour arising from interac...
- Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:57 am
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
Woohoo! You finally fucking got it right!jamest wrote:Given that the observation/experience of X, and X itself, cannot in principle be identical entities,
Now, what are you going to do with this trivial bit of information that most of us grasped while you were still spreading turds on your face?
- Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:51 am
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
I've told you before, rEv, that's not how you spell 'moron'.rEvolutionist wrote:And aren't you an atheist, allegedly?
- Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:49 am
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
If you think that definite matter can exist as a 'field equation', or that 'field equations' can actually interact, then you're off your fucking trolley. Care to define 'matter' for us, Jimmy ? That has to be a pork pie. Nobody can have their head buried that deeply into the sand. Well, yours isn't...
- Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:43 am
- Forum: General Serious Discussion & Philosophy
- Topic: Jamest is right!
- Replies: 270
- Views: 32402
Re: Jamest is right!
... Einstein's work only undermines Newton's because there are no "bodies having, as it were, a complete, absolute and independent reality in themselves". Do you really want me to fuck this idiotic shit over again? You've already demonstrated categorically that you understand neither Newton nor Ein...