rationalia.com

Magicziggy wrote: What does one have to do to be your friend?

Sign up at TR.

higgs2 wrote:eta pluswhich i didn't unvote you until you started babling, that was sparklecat

I never voted him in the first place, much less unvoted.


But I suppose I will vote for him!

gandalf wrote:its ok sparkle and higgs u will bask in my awsum victory so much u wont even realize u lost

I seriously considered your point, but decided that if you just go around winning all the time, all the new people will become too discouraged. I think a noble self-sacrifice might be in order.

2 votes!! \o/ this is like a popularity contest only better coz its on the internetz!!! higgs2 6. is the sekrit to winning mafia so i cannot tell u but it will prolly not involve breaking da rulez unless its rly rly necessary. and 7. is where i win see Gandalf, I would vote for you, but what if we ...

Dean, I'm not really sure what you think is gandalf's normal behaviour which is so objectionable.

Ok FBM; fair enough, though also see my previous post. And just to clarify, the threat to suspend me on JimC's part was due to suspicion that I was someone's sock rather than, as stated, because of what I'd just posted? Read it carefully: it was not a threat to suspend, it was a prediction you were...

Ok FBM; fair enough, though also see my previous post. And just to clarify, the threat to suspend me on JimC's part was due to suspicion that I was someone's sock rather than, as stated, because of what I'd just posted? Read it carefully: it was not a threat to suspend, it was a prediction you were...

Heh. I remember from my own time as a mod what a pain waiting around for enough people for a consensus could be, and the pressure to do something about a situation currently in progress without that consensus. And how badly that could end up backfiring. It just looked really bad from this end; Bart ...

I would very much like BartRob to return and play, sans the abusiveness .. everyone else manages it and the games have been a great deal of fun that way. It's really up to him how this proceeds for him. So that's a no on the corporate responsibility thing, then; ok. I really don't see this proceedi...

Ok FBM; fair enough, though also see my previous post.



And just to clarify, the threat to suspend me on JimC's part was due to suspicion that I was someone's sock rather than, as stated, because of what I'd just posted?

I'd like to explain ... A short while back, after a reminder and warning, Bart Rob was suspended for 24 hours for a previous breach of the guidelines. He was told then that the next one would get him a 48 hour suspension. FBM and xamones chegwe were unaware of this when they spoke to Bart Rob about...

I reported the post after that warning. He has shown no indication that he intended to stop the the abuse. He'll be playing here with his mates if it's reversed. It's poison. Do you think the post after the warning was deserving of a suspension, not for what you felt it indicated, but in and of its...

Oh, boy. Look, gang, I want to apologize if it looked like I was being heavy-handed or demanding that people pander to my ego. I was blunt with BartRob because he'd just come back from a suspension and started telling people to "shut the fuck up" and generally showing that he had no intention of ge...

Also, yeah, Ayaan and Charlou's efforts here are definitely helping to correct a bad first impression.

But because I came here with some of the others, I'm looked on with suspicion, and threatened with a suspension when I indicate that it's rather unfair to suspend someone else for a post they've already been warned for simply because they're not showing proper deference to the moderators. I have to...