rationalia.com

Not much in the why of guns from what I've seen. Relatively speaking, of course. I thought the why of guns was covered in the second amendment. :tea: I believe it was so citizens could protect themselves against the government. Of cause when the government has 10,000 tanks and a shit load of ballis...

Valden mentioned that the US news never refers to homegrown terrorists as the "American taliban" in the post that RB took exception to. To the best of my understanding, she was not referring to the entire religious right either. Her point, and mine, was that there are groups that are every bit as f...

Not really. You can hint at homegrown terrorists (like the American Taliban aka Christian Fundies) but if you were to actually come right out and say it on a popular news station, both the American Taliban and the politically correct Fluffies would freak. You don't watch much television, do you? I ...

Jörmungandr wrote:

Gawdzilla wrote:Not much in the why of guns from what I've seen. Relatively speaking, of course.

Well, if they needed some extra 5.56 I'd be glad to give it to them. One at a time, at 3000+ feet per second, of course.

"When you need relief fast" .

Bella Fortuna wrote:

pawiz wrote:

Bella Fortuna wrote:The charitable status excuse WAS bullshit, I had from a reliable source.

We know that you "had it"

Isn't it time to use the long knives on you yet?

Heh, wouldn't that depend on which part of him you intend on cutting? .

(Sorry pawiz... had to )

Elessarina wrote:Are you going to tell us where they are?

Nope, they're mine... all mine .

It's been my experience that anyone with any sense of rationality picks their traits and adds "mostly". So the tag line works well. I don't worry about the "mostlies", that I know. It's the full on bat-shit insane "absolute" people I worry about.

Thanks for the warm welcome.

After dealing in the world of the real where it appears stupidity is writ large, I'm happy to finally find a bunch of rabid atheists to converse with.